News
Supreme Court Upholds FDA’s Denial of Flavored Vape Products
Recently, in a landmark decision, the US Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous decision to support the FDA in disapproving the marketing applications of flavored e-cigarettes. This landmark decision supports the FDA’s ongoing commitment to ensuring the health of the American public and reducing access to vaping products for young people.
Case Overview
The case was about two e-cigarette companies, Triton Distribution and Vapetasia, that requested permission from the FDA to market flavored vape liquids with flavors like “Killer Kustard Blueberry”, “Rainbow Road”, and “Pineapple Express”. The FDA had rejected their applications in the past, expressing an opinion that such flavors are more attractive to youths and are a reason for the increasing rate of youths using vaping and nicotine products. These companies challenged the decision of the FDA, arguing that the agency had altered its rules on approval in a manner inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The Supreme Court sided with the FDA when it evaluated the agency's actions because those measures matched its mandate to safeguard public health.Court's Ruling
Justice Samuel Alito, in writing the opinion for the Court, affirmed that the FDA’s evolving guidelines did not constitute an unlawful shift in policy. The ruling also supported that the FDA was within its jurisdiction to regulate tobacco products and its decisions were further in concordance with its past release on tobacco regulation.Impact on Public Health
The American Heart Association and other health organizations view the Supreme Court ruling as a major breakthrough in preventing youth vaping. Numerous studies demonstrate how young users strongly prefer flavored e-cigarettes that have fruity or sweet tastes.The FDA draws support from evidence demonstrating that attractive flavors in e-cigarettes lead youth to develop nicotine addiction, which threatens their long-term health.